Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 12;14:1281922. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1281922

Table 3.

Deep learning approaches in mammography for breast lesion segmentation.

Year Model Evaluation Dataset Noise remove method Performance Metrics (results)
2015 (59) CRF INbreast and DDSM-BCRP NA The method achieved an 89.0% Dice index in 0.1.
2018 (60) adversarial deep structured net INbreast and DDSM-BCRP NA The method achieved a segmentation rate of 97.0%.
2018 (61) deep learning using You-Only-Look-Once INbreast NA The method achieved detection rate of 98.96%, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 97.62%, and F1 score of 99.24%.
2018 (62) CRU-Net INbreast and DDSM-BCRP NA The CRU-Net achieved a Dice Index DI of 93.66% for INbreast and a DI of 93.32% for DDSM-BCRP.
2019 (63) MS-ResCU-Net and ResCU-Net INbreast NA The MS-ResCU-Net achieved an accuracy of 94.16%, sensitivity of 93.11%, specificity of 95.02%, DI of 91.78%, Jac of 85.13%, and MCC of 87.22%, while ResCU-Net correspondingly achieved 92.91%, 91.51%, 94.64%, 90.50%, 83.02%, and 84.99%.
2019 (64) dense U-Net with AGs DDSM NA The method achieved 82.24% F1 score, 77.89% sensitivity, and overall accuracy of 78.38%.
2019 (65) RU-Net DDSM, BCDR-01, and INbreast cLare filter The proposed model achieved a mean test pixel accuracy of 98.00%, a mean Dice coefficient index (DI) of 98.00%, and mean IOU of 94.00%.
2019 (66) modified U-Net DDSM Laplacian filter The method produced 98.50% of the F-measure and a 97.80% Dice score, Jaccard index of 97.40%, and average accuracy of 98.20%.
2020 (67) mammographic CAD based on pseudocolour mammograms and mask RCNN INbreast morphological filters The DSI achieved for mass segmentation was 0.88Â ± 0.10, and GMs and mask RCNN yielded an average TPR of 0.90Â ± 0.05.
2020 (68) FrCN INbreast NA FrCN achieved an overall accuracy of 92.97%, 85.93% for MCC, 92.69% for Dice, and 86.37% for the Jaccard similarity coefficient.
2020 (69) U-Net CBIS-DDSM, INbreast, UCHCDM, and BCDR-01 adaptive median filter The U-Net model achieved a mean Dice coefficient index of 95.10% and a mean IOU of 90.90%.
2020 (70) cGAN INbreast median filter The cGAN achieved an accuracy of 98.0%, Dice coefficient of 88.0%, and Jaccard index of 78.0%.
2020 (71) cGAN DDSM and INbreast Morphological operations The proposed cGAN model achieved a Dice coefficient of 94.0% and an intersection over union (IoU) of 87.0%
2020 (72) mask RCNN and DeepLab MIAS and DDSM Savitzky Golay filter The mask RCNN achieved an AUC of 98.00%, DeepLab achieved an AUC of 95.00%.
2020 (73) AUNet CBIS-DDSM and INbreast NA produced an average Dice similarity coefficient of 81.80% for CBIS-DDSM and 79.10% for INbreast
2020 (74) mask RCNN-FPN training on DDSM and testing on the INbreast database NA The model achieved a mean average precision of 84.0% for multidetection and 91.0% segmentation accuracy.
2020 (75) U-Net DDSM NA The model achieved a sensitivity of 92.32%, specificity of 80.47%, accuracy of 85.95%, Dice coefficient index of 79.39%, and AUC of 86.40%.
2021 (76) modified CNN based on U-Net model DDSM-400 and CBIS-DDSM NA The method achieved a diagnostic performance of 89.8% and AUC of 86.20% based on ground-truth segmentation maps and a maximum of 88.0% and 86.0% for U-Net-based segmentation for DDSM-400 and CBIS-DDSM, respectively.
2021 (77) deeply supervised U-Net DDSM and INbreast cLare filter The method achieved 82.70% of Dice, 85.70% of Jaccard coefficient, 99.70% accuracy, 83.10% sensitivity, and 99.80% specificity.
2021 (78) modified U-Net MIAS, DDSM, and CBIS-DDSM NA The method achieved accuracy of 98.87%, AUC of 98.88%, sensitivity of 98.98%, precision of 98.79%, and F1 score of 97.99% on the DDSM datasets
2023 (79) Tubule-U-Net 30820 polygonal annotated tubules in 8225 patches NA achieved 95.33%, 93.74%, and 90.02%, dice, sensitivity, and specificity scores, respectively

N/A, Not Applicate.