Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020 Nov 23;21(2):121–124. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2665

Table 1.

Distribution of Explanatory Variables and Associations with Bartonella tribocorum Status Among Norway Rats

Bartonella tribocorum status
Bivariable GLMMa
Category Subcategory Total (%) (n = 370) Positive (%) (n = 96) Negative (%) (n = 274) OR (95% CI) p

Season Fall 150 (40.5) 74 (77.1) 76 (27.7) Ref
Winter 77 (20.8) 5 (6.5) 72 (26.3) 0.08 (0.02–0.45) <0.001
Spring 103 (27.8) 12 (12.5) 91 (33.2) 0.09 (0.02–0.38) <0.01
Summer 40 (10.8) 5 (5.2) 35 (12.8) 0.07 (0.01–0.59)  0.01
Maturity Immature 89 (24.1) 9 (9.4) 80 (29.2) Ref
Mature 281 (75.9) 87 (90.6) 194 (70.8) 2.45 (1.07–5.64) 0.03
Flea presence No 159 (43.0) 35 (36.5) 124 (45.3) Ref
Yes 211 (57.0) 61 (63.5) 150 (54.7) 1.17 (0.65–2.11) 0.59
Flea abundance 0 159 (43.0) 35 (36.5) 124 (45.3) Ref
1–3 167 (45.1) 45 (46.9) 122 (44.5) 1.10 (0.60–2.04) 0.76
>3 44 (11.9) 16 (16.7) 28 (10.2) 1.48 (0.61–3.61) 0.39
Flea index ≤ 0.65 151 (40.8) 53 (55.2) 98 (35.8) Ref
0.65–1.3 107 (28.9) 26 (27.1) 81 (29.6) 0.39 (0.05–3.25) 0.39
>1.3 112 (30.3) 17 (17.7) 95 (34.7) 0.21 (0.03–1.47) 0.12
a

GLMM controlling for clustering by city block in which the rat was trapped.

CI, confidence interval; GLMM, generalized linear mixed model; OR, odds ratio.