Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: PLOS Water. 2022 Jun 15;1(6):10.1371/journal.pwat.0000027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000027

Table 4a:

Healthcare infrastructure

Country # HCFs # HCFs with improved onsite water supply (%) # HCFs with hand hygiene resources at 100% of points-of-care (%) # HCFs with hand hygiene resources at <75–99% of points-of-care (%) # HCFs with hand hygiene resources at <75% of points-of-care (%)
Belize 11 11 (100%) 2 (18%) 5 (46%) 4 (36%)
Burkina Faso 15 10 (66%) 0 (0%) 7 (47%) 8 (53%)
Dominican Republic 2 2 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 2 (100%)
Guatemala 19 18 (95%) 0 (0%) 19 (100%) 0 (0%)
Kenya 42 42 (100%) 2 (5%) 2 (5%) 38 (90%)
Uganda 121 10 (83%) 3 (25%) 4 (33%) 5 (42%)
132 10 (77%) 0 (0%) 4 (31%) 9 (69%)

Table 4b: Healthcare hand hygiene observations

Country # HCFs Observations where provider practiced hand hygiene (%)1 Observations where provider practiced hand hygiene before patient contact Observations where provider practiced hand hygiene after patient contact

Belize 11 363 (49%) 144 (39%) 219 (59%)
Dominican Republic 2 322 (23%) 62 (9%) 260 (37%)
Guatemala 19 150 (30%) 47 (19%) 109 (44%)
Kenya 102 70 (22%) 31 (20%) 39 (25%)
Uganda 12 167 (38%) 57 (26%) 110 (50%)
1

Amuru and Tororo Districts, non-refugee/IDP populations, Uganda

2

Adjumani, Arua, Madi-Okollo, and Terego Districts, refugee/IDP populations, Uganda.

1

Before patient contact, after patient contact, or both

2

Enumerators selected a random sample of 10 of the 42 HCFs for observation