Table 5a:
Household and Community infrastructure
Country | Setting | # locations | # locations with improved water source 1 | # locations with at least one HW station present | # entrances/exits typically have at least one HW station2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Burkina Faso | Household | 405 | 388 (96%) | 8 (2.0%)3 | NA |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | Schools | 27 | 8 (30%) | 18 (67%) | NA |
Uganda | Markets | 10 | 4 (44%)4 | 5 (50%) | 4 (40%) |
Schools | 7 | 6 (100%)5 | 6 (86%) | 5 (71%) | |
Points of entry | 15 | 10 (71%)6 | 9 (60%) | 10 (71%)7 | |
| |||||
Table 5b: Community hand hygiene observations | |||||
| |||||
Country | Setting | # locations | Observations where hand hygiene was practiced upon entrance/exit to location (%) | Observations where hand hygiene was practiced after latrine use (%) | |
| |||||
Uganda | Markets | 10 | 7 (58%) | 35 (63%) | |
Schools | 7 | 4 (17%) | 29 (39%) | ||
Points of entry | 15 | 20 (19%) | 5 (42%) |
For households, principal water source accessed is improved; for community infrastructure, locations have an improved water source onsite
Assessed at community institutions only, doesn’t assess functionality
7 households with a handwashing station (88%) had both water and soap present at stations at time of survey
4/9 because of missing data
6/6 because of missing data
10/14 because of missing data
10/14 because of missing data