Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: PLOS Water. 2022 Jun 15;1(6):10.1371/journal.pwat.0000027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000027

Table 5a:

Household and Community infrastructure

Country Setting # locations # locations with improved water source 1 # locations with at least one HW station present # entrances/exits typically have at least one HW station2
Burkina Faso Household 405 388 (96%) 8 (2.0%)3 NA
Democratic Republic of the Congo Schools 27 8 (30%) 18 (67%) NA
Uganda Markets 10 4 (44%)4 5 (50%) 4 (40%)
Schools 7 6 (100%)5 6 (86%) 5 (71%)
Points of entry 15 10 (71%)6 9 (60%) 10 (71%)7

Table 5b: Community hand hygiene observations

Country Setting # locations Observations where hand hygiene was practiced upon entrance/exit to location (%) Observations where hand hygiene was practiced after latrine use (%)

Uganda Markets 10 7 (58%) 35 (63%)
Schools 7 4 (17%) 29 (39%)
Points of entry 15 20 (19%) 5 (42%)
1

For households, principal water source accessed is improved; for community infrastructure, locations have an improved water source onsite

2

Assessed at community institutions only, doesn’t assess functionality

3

7 households with a handwashing station (88%) had both water and soap present at stations at time of survey

4

4/9 because of missing data

5

6/6 because of missing data

6

10/14 because of missing data

7

10/14 because of missing data