Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 9;8(2):311–319. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01749-9

Table 1.

Name, description and citation or online location of the self-confirmatory tests for the 16 discoveries included in this meta-analysis

Study name Description of central result Citation
Tumour People hold others responsible for their past good behaviour caused entirely by a brain tumour but not responsible for their past bad behaviour. https://osf.io/4n8pf/
Minimal Groups People demonstrate less ingroup favouritism when they have been changed from one minimal group to another than when they have not changed group membership. https://osf.io/adrbe/
Cookies People are seen as greedier when they take three of the same kind of (free) cookie than when they take three different (free) cookies. https://osf.io/3vz4k/?view_only=da10896b68fe4420bf6c65a3a7bd64f6
Label When a researcher uses a label to describe people who hold a certain opinion, he or she is interpreted as disagreeing with that opinion when a negative label is used and agreeing with that opinion when a positive label is used. https://osf.io/xq5jb/?view_only=5305a812208d48bba3e546bfe38c6c24
Self-Control Someone who commits battery due to self-control failure is less likely to be found guilty if their failure was due to brain damage instead of genes for low self-control. Ref. 44
Orientation People judge same-sex interactions as more indicative of the sexuality of men than that of women. https://osf.io/s6qdv/
Referrals People think it is less appropriate to send product referrals when they are the sender of the referral than when they are merely judging the behaviour of someone else who sends the referral. https://osf.io/v3thd/?view_only=1c32808a01ee4c8c816480825ad5bebf
Ads Watching a short ad within a soap-opera episode increases one’s likelihood to recommend and promote the company in the ad. https://osf.io/ngz5k/?view_only=8cf18a2babc1499e98ef57dbb9926a80
FSD Forcing people to answer questions quickly makes them give more socially desirable answers. Ref. 45
Prediction People make more complicated sets of predictions when asked to do so without having the opportunity to explore data. https://osf.io/e2sf8/
Fairness People evaluate the fairness of punishments that can be expressed in multiple currencies (for example, time and money) on the basis of whichever currency is initially more salient, but they update their fairness judgements when the translation to the other currency is highlighted. Ref. 46
Ostracism People who are ostracized by computers in an online ball-tossing game become less trusting towards people in general. https://osf.io/58vz9/?view_only=312b6136155849a79f3416933a05789b
Misattribution People misattribute the feeling of a-ha! they feel while solving an anagram to the truth of the statement the anagram is embedded in. Ref. 47
Redemption People who look different after committing a transgression seem more remorseful, trustworthy and deserving of a second chance than people who look the same as they did at the time of their transgression. http://osf.io/6h5s2/
Worse People evaluate Team B more favourably when they are told that Team A is more qualified than Team B than when they are told that Team B is less qualified than Team A. Ref. 48
Misreporting People will report not engaging in an activity if they learn that reporting they have engaged in the activity will result in several additional questions. https://osf.io/3ud4s/?view_only=420da5b8113b42be8710cd7c4b4af14a