Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 13;15:1369766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369766

Table 2.

Characteristics of studies used in the diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis.

Study CU sample size CU age aMCI sample size aMCI age AUC ± SE Cutoff score
Ahmed et al. (2012) 20 77.4 ± 4.0 15 80.9 ± 7.2 0.89 ± 0.05 23
Cecato et al. (2017) 39 71.6 ± 6.9 44 76.7 ± 7.0 0.93 ± 0.03 24
Clarnette et al. (2017) 41 nr 72 nr 0.94 ± 0.02 23
Cummings-Vaughn et al. (2014) 51 77 ± 7.5 57 78.8 ± 6.7 0.77 ± 0.05 24
Dautzenberg et al. (2020) 459 71.3 ± 7.3 153 73.9 ± 8 0.70 ± 0.02 21
Delgado et al. (2019) 104 72.3 ± 5.4 24 75.3 ± 7.8 0.90 ± 0.03 21
Dong et al. (2013) 128 67.4 ± 4.8 83 74.3 ± 5.5 0.94 ± 0.02 24
Freitas et al. (2013) 90 69.6 ± 7.1 90 70.5 ± 8.0 0.86 ± 0.01 22
Fujiwara et al. (2010) 36 76.4 ± 3.3 30 77.3 ± 6.3 0.95 ± 0.03 25
Goldstein et al. (2014) 16 65.8 ± 7.7 38 71.9 ± 8.9 0.81 ± 0.06 24
Hemrungrojn et al. (2021) 60 67.9 ± 6.4 61 72.1 ± 7.0 0.81 ± 0.04 24
Julayanont et al. (2015) 43 66.6 ± 6.7 42 70.2 ± 6.6 0.90 ± 0.03 25
Kaya et al. (2014) 246 68.0 ± 10.3 114 74.2 ± 8.8 0.85 ± 0.02 nr
Larner (2012) 85 nr 29 nr 0.91 ± 0.02 20
Lee et al. (2018) 35 73.6 ± 6.4 36 76.2 ± 7.4 0.94 ± 0.03 nr
Li et al. (2018) 53 70.2 ± 9.1 56 75.2 ± 7.1 0.82 ± 0.07 24
Liew et al. (2015) 146 64.9 ± 7.0 41 71.8 ± 6.7 0.77 ± 0.05 25
Liu et al. (2021) 50 68.0 ± 8.2 50 76.7 ± 10.8 0.74 ± 0.05 23
Lu et al. (2011) 6,283 72.0 1,687 75.1 0.90 ± 0.005 25
Malek-Ahmadi et al. (2014) 73 82.6 ± 7.7 39 80.5 ± 8.4 0.71 ± 0.05 nr
Masika et al. (2021) 19 69.3 ± 5.8 42 70.4 ± 8.0 0.69 ± 0.07 19
Mellor et al. (2016) 708 72.5 ± 8.4 267 76.5 ± 7.7 0.90 ± 0.01 24
Memória et al. (2013) 28 72.5 ± 5.3 30 74.7 ± 5.7 0.82 ± 0.06 nr
Ng et al. (2015) 88 nr 46 nr 0.50 ± 0.05 nr
O’Caoimh et al. (2016) 101 nr 103 nr 0.84 ± 0.06 24
Pan et al. (2022) 431 66.5 ± 9.3 285 72.1 ± 10.5 0.92 ± 0.01 23
Paterson et al. (2022) 40 74.0 ± 7.0 51 75.0 ± 5.7 0.71 ± 0.05 nr
Peixoto et al. (2018) 30 68.6 ± 6.2 30 67.2 ± 9.3 0.78 ± 0.05 22
Pinto et al. (2019a,b) 110 nr 88 nr 0.95 ± 0.02 nr
Roalf et al. (2013) 140 71.2 ± 9.2 126 72.3 ± 8.1 0.73 ± 0.06 nr
Rodríguez-Salgado et al. (2021) 53 70.4 ± 5.9 46 72.7 ± 7.5 0.73 ± 0.06 nr
Rossetti et al. (2019) 45 62.3 ± 6.8 90 64.8 ± 5.9 0.83 ± 0.04 24
Senda et al. (2020) 50 64.9 ± 12.0 94 73.5 ± 8.3 0.83 ± 0.04 nr
Serrano et al. (2020) 155 71.5 ± 6.2 158 72.6 ± 6.3 0.88 ± 0.02 25
Thomann et al. (2020) 283 73.8 ± 5.2 159 76.0 ± 6.0 0.86 ± 0.01 25
Townley et al. (2019) 313 81.7 ± 5.0 114 84 ± 5.2 0.85 ± 0.02 24
Tsai et al. (2016) 26 nr 59 nr 0.91 ± 0.03 27
Yeung et al. (2014) 49 73.6 ± 7.6 49 76.5 ± 7.5 0.84 ± 0.04 21
Yu et al. (2012) 865 70.4 ± 7.1 115 71.5 ± 7.3 0.71 ± 0.02 21
Zhou et al. (2014) 148 67.7 ± 7.2 24 67.2 ± 6.6 0.72 ± 0.10 26

CU, cognitively unimpaired; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AUC, area under the curve; SE, standard error; nr, not reported.