Table 3.
Sensory panel I: caregivers’ evaluation of ComFA+Fish chibwabwa fisashi (n 42)
| Sensory attributes | Extremely liked | Liked | Neutral | Disliked | Extremely disliked | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | |
| 1. Aroma | 92·9 | 39 | 4·8 | 2 | – | – | 2·4 | 1 | ||
| 2. Appearance | 88·1 | 37 | 9·5 | 4 | – | – | 2·4 | 1 | ||
| 3. Mouth feel/texture | 83·3 | 35 | 11·9 | 5 | – | – | 4·8 | 2 | ||
| 4. Flavour/taste | 92·9 | 39 | 4·8 | 2 | – | – | 2·4 | 1 | ||
| 5. Sweetness | 75 | 21 | 10·7 | 3 | 14·3 | 4 | – | – | ||
| Average of attributes 1–5 | 86·4 | 34 | 8·3 | 3 | 14·3 | 4 | – | 12 | 1 | |
| Non-sensory attributes | ||||||||||
| 6. Convenience | 73·8 | 31 | 19 | 8 | 4·8 | 2 | 2·4 | 1 | – | |
| 7. Overall acceptability | 95·2 | 40 | 4·8 | 2 | – | – | – | |||