Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 21;17:121–144. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.11.005

Table 4.

The changes of trend due to interventions for patients undergoing CABG (pre-vs post- and Michigan vs non-Michigan centers)

Time period and Michigan vs non-Michigan comparisons Odds ratio
(per mo increase)
95% CI P value
Non-Michigan—preintervention 1.16 1.05 1.29 .0049
Non-Michigan—post (time 11-18) 0.74 0.66 0.84 <.0001
Non-Michigan—post (time >18) 1.10 1.04 1.16 .0011
Michigan—pre 0.98 0.94 1.02 .2449
Michigan—post (time 11-18) 1.88 1.78 1.99 <.0001
Michigan—post (time >18) 1.20 1.15 1.26 <.0001
Michigan—post (time 11-18) vs pre 1.93 1.78 2.09 <.0001
Non-Michigan—post (time 11-18) vs pre 0.64 0.52 0.78 <.0001
Pre: Michigan vs non-Michigan 0.84 0.75 0.94 .0024
Post (time 11-18): Michigan vs non-Michigan 2.53 2.21 2.91 <.0001

CI, Confidence interval; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting.