Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 3;17:74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.11.019

Table 2.

Outcomes after mitral valve replacement in propensity score–matched patients with endocarditis, stratified by valve type

Characteristic All matched patients (n = 2124) B-MVR (n = 1068) M-MVR (n = 1056) P value
In-hospital mortality 105/2124 (5.0%) 53/1068 (5.0%) 52/1056 (4.9%) .98
LOS, d 20 (13-32) 20 (13-34) 20 (13-31) .64
Index hospitalization cost, USD 96,313.2 ± 78,428.7 97,350.3 ± 66,031.7 95,258.6 ± 89,347.1 .15
Disposition .21
 Home health care 704 (38.7%) 345 (37.6%) 359 (39.8%)
 Routine 541 (29.7%) 262 (28.5%) 279 (30.9%)
 Short-term hospital 40 (2.2%) 20 (2.1%) 20 (2.2%)
 Skilled nursing or intermediate care facility 485 (26.6%) 255 (27.8%) 230 (25.5%)
 Against medical advice 50 (2.7%) 37 (4.0%) 13 (1.4%)
30-d readmission 342 (18.8%) 176 (19.2%) 167 (18.5%) .79
90-d readmission 443/1530 (28.9%) 230/755 (30.5%) 213/776 (27.5%) .39
Elective readmission 63/690 (9.2%) 22/363 (6.1%) 41/327 (12.6%) .07
Died on readmission 41/690 (6.0%) 19/363 (5.4%) 22/327 (6.7%) .63

Data presented as mean ± SD, n (%), or n/N (%). B-MVR, Bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement; M-MVR, mechanical mitral valve replacement; LOS, length of stay.

Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test for complex survey samples; chi-square test with Rao & Scott's second-order correction.