Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Nat. 2023 Oct 27;202(6):737–752. doi: 10.1086/726736

Table 2:

Evolutionary forces relevant to modelling load and how these forces impact load

Evolutionary force Impact on genetic load Impact on inbreeding load

Population size (N) Decrease with increasing N Increase with increasing N
Mutation rate (μ) Increase with increasing μ Increase with increasing μ
Deleterious mutation target size (G) Increase with increasing G Increase with increasing G
Distribution of fitness effects (s) Depends on N* Increase with increasing mean s
Dominance distribution (h) Increase as h increases from 0 to 0.5 Decrease as h increases from 0 to 0.5
Recombination rate (r) Decrease with increasing r Decrease with increasing r
*

Note that, under classical models of mutation load due to mutations segregating under mutation-selection balance, s does not impact load. However, this result does not hold when considering fixed mutations and finite population size. See Kimura 1963 for a detailed analysis of the effects of s, h, and N on genetic load.