Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 12;26:e45817. doi: 10.2196/45817

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for associations between region (urban or rural) and knowledge, interest, expectation, and use of digital applications in dermatology (survey date: 2021). The values in italics are significant.


Urban (n=600), n (%)a Rural (n=192), n (%)a P valueb aOR (95% CI) for urban/rural; reference: ruralc
Interest, knowledge, and confidence in digital medicine: “fully agree” or “agree”

Interest in digital medicine 372 (62) 91 (47.4) <.001 1.70 (1.17-2.47)

Good knowledge of digital medicine 228 (38) 50 (26) .01 1.64 (1.06-2.49)

Confidence in using digital applications 279 (46.5) 61 (31.8) .002 1.73 (1.17-2.58)
Use of digital application: “very frequent” or “frequent”

Real-time video consultation 55 (9.2) 7 (3.6) .05 2.68 (0.95-7.51)

Asynchronous communication with patients (eg, email and SMS text message) 295 (49.2) 63 (32.8) .01 1.79 (1.20-2.68)

Real-time communication for professional exchange (eg, video conference) 154 (25.7) 30 (15.6) .02 1.90 (1.13-3.17)

Asynchronous communication for professional exchange (eg, email and SMS text message) 297 (49.5) 70 (36.5) <.001 1.62 (1.10-2.39)

Remote patient monitoring 45 (7.5) 12 (6.3) .58 1.19 (0.56-2.52)

Electronic reminder of appointments for patients 185 (30.8) 33 (17.2) <.001 2.01 (1.24-3.27)

Electronic doctor’s letter 89 (14.8) 20 (10.4) .22 1.54 (0.83-2.86)

Electronic or web-based data from patients (eg, apps, wearables, and body values) 32 (5.3) 8 (4.2) .51 1.31 (0.49-3.56)

Artificial intelligence applications for diagnostic purposes 132 (22.0) 38 (19.8) .52 1.12 (0.70-1.82)
Expectations of digital medicine

Importance of digital transformation in Germany in the future: “great importance” 400 (66.7) 104 (54.2) <.001 1.64 (1.08-2.48)

Expectation of risks associated with digital medicine: “great risks” 205 (34.2) 101 (52.6) <.001 0.51 (0.35-0.76)

Know guideline “Practice of teledermatology:” “yes, read” 84 (14.0) 25 (13.0) .79 1.23 (0.74-2.08)

Procedures facilitate practical activity: “yes” and “partly” 270 (45.0) 72 (37.5) .10 1.28 (0.86-1.93)

Importance of digital health applications (DiGAd) in the future: “great importance” 185 (39.8) 48 (33.3) .14 1.30 (0.87-1.95)
Connection to the national telematics infrastructure: “yes” and “no, but requested”

Telematic infrastructure 473 (78.8) 175 (91.1) <.001 0.37 (0.21-0.68)

Electronic health professional card (eHBAe) 471 (78.5) 163 (84.9) .06 0.61 (0.35-1.31)
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and digitalization

Increased the use of digital applications due to SARS-CoV-2: “yes” 237 (39.5) 59 (30.7) .05 1.37 (0.91-2.06)

Continue to use application in the future: “yes” and “partially” 221 (93.2) 57 (96.6) .50 0.63 (0.14-2.95)

aUnadjusted or crude values.

bChi-square tests were performed.

cLogistic regressions were performed. Following items were included as independent variables: age (≥50 years or < 50 years) and sex (male or female).

dDiGAs: Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen.

eeHBA: elektronischer Heilberufeausweis.