Table 1.
Characteristic | Full sample |
Best-evidence sample |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
, |
, |
|||||
% | % | |||||
| ||||||
Peer-reviewed publication | 62 | 44 | 26 | 72 | ||
Sample restrictions | ||||||
Posttransfer | 84 | 52 | 0 | 0 | ||
Different cohort definitions | 26 | 18 | 0 | 0 | ||
Baccalaureate aspirants | 27 | 19 | 12 | 33 | ||
Identification strategy | ||||||
Mean comparison | 76 | 54 | 0 | 0 | ||
Regression | 39 | 28 | 19 | 53 | ||
Exploit exogenous variation | 9 | 6 | 7 | 19 | ||
Propensity score matching | 18 | 13 | 10 | 28 | ||
Statistical controls | ||||||
Background characteristics | 60 | 42 | 36 | 100 | ||
Aspirations | 33 | 23 | 21 | 58 | ||
Enrollment pattern | 23 | 16 | 10 | 28 | ||
Data characteristics | ||||||
Year began collegea | 1990.8 (11.44) | 1991.17 (10.94) | ||||
Follow-up perioda | 6.68 (1.91) | 7.31 (2.04) | ||||
Control-group graduation ratea | .64 (0.17) | .6 (0.14) | ||||
Effect size | −.16 (0.18) | −.23 (0.1) |
Note: = number of data sources; = number of effect sizes.
Continuous variable.