Table 4.

Linear mixed models: analysis of health outcomes over time

	ICCa	Intercept			T1 (Reference is T0)			T2 (Reference is T0)			T3 (Reference is T0)
			SE	95% CI		SE	95% CI		SE	95% CI		SE	95% CI
Qualidem subscores
Care relationship	.55	4.3	9.5	-14.9–23.4	3.6*	.6	2.4–4.8	3.7*	.6	2.6–4.9	2.2*	.9	.3–4.0
Positive affect	.64	21.5*	8.6	4.2–39.0	1.7*	.5	.7–2.6	1.9*	.6	.7–3.1	.6	.7	− .8–2.0
Negative affect	.64	10.1*	3.9	1.9–18.3	.9*	.3	.3–1.5	1.0*	.3	.4–1.6	− .5	.5	-1.5 – .5
Restless tense behaviour	.53	.8	6.0	-11.2–12.9	1.1*	.4	.3–1.9	1.7*	.5	.6–2.8	.7	.5	− .3–1.7
Positive self-image	.74	10.5	4.2	2.0–19.1	.7*	.2	.3–1.2	.9*	.2	.4–1.3	.4	.3	− .3–1.1
Social relations	.72	18.1	9.3	− .8–37.0	1.0	.5	− .0–2.1	1.7*	.6	.4–2.9	.1	.6	-1.0–1.3
Social isolation	.68	.9	4.2	-7.7–9.4	.7*	.3	.1–1.2	.8*	.3	.2–1.3	.4	.3	− .2–1.0
Feeling at home	.50	16.1*	5.4	5.1–27.0	1.0*	.5	.1–1.9	1.8*	.5	.9–2.8	1.2*	.5	.1–2.2
Having something to do	.53	8.8*	3.5	1.8–15.8	.9*	.3	.4–1.4	.7*	.3	.1–1.3	− .5	.3	-1.1 – .2
CMAI	.69	58.3	37.0	-16.6–133.1	-8.8*	2.0	-12.8 - -4.8	-6.9*	2.1	-11.1 - -2.7	-6.5*	2.5	-11.5 - -1.4
InterRai Cognition	.60	14.2*	6.5	1.1–27.3	-1.7*	.5	-2.7 - − .7	-1.8*	.4	-2.6 - − .9	− .7	.5	-1.6 – .4
Barthel	.93	10,3	12.7	-15.5–35.9	− .2	.3	− .9 – .5	− .4	.4	-1.2 – .3	.2	.4	-1.0 – .7
CSDD	.78	4.2	11.0	-18.5–26.9	.2	.5	− .8–1.2	.7	.7	− .7–2.1	.4	.8	-1.1–2.0
POMA	.89	23.3*	9.9	2.6–44.0	− .6*	.3	-1.2 – − .0	-1.3*	.4	-2.2 - − .5	− .5	.5	-1.5 – .6

*Boldface indicates significance P < .05

Adjusted for age, sex and type of dementia

ICC: Intra-level Correlation Coefficient, SE: Standard Error, CI: Confidence Interval

CMAI: Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory, POMA: Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment, CSDD: Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia