Summary of findings 3. Low‐level laser therapy (LLLT) plus exercise compared to exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).
Low‐level laser therapy (LLLT) plus exercise compared to placebo plus exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) | ||||||
Patient or population: patients with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) Settings: physical therapy clinic in high‐income country Intervention: LLLT plus exercise Comparison: placebo laser therapy plus exercise | ||||||
Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Assumed risk | Corresponding risk | |||||
Placebo laser therapy plus exercise | LLLT plus exercise | |||||
Participant‐reported pain relief ≥ 30% | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | ‐ | See comment | No studies reported this outcome |
Overall pain 0‐100 visual analogue scale (lower score = less pain) Follow‐up: at 4th week of treatment |
The mean overall pain in the control group was 51 points | The mean overall pain in the intervention group was 19 points lower (23 to 15 lower) | 63 (1 study) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | Absolute risk difference 19% (23% to 15% fewer); relative per cent change2 28% (34% to 22% fewer) NNTB = 1 (1 to 2) |
|
Function Shoulder Disabilty Questionnaire 0‐100 (lower scores = better function) Follow‐up: at 4th week of treatment | The mean function in the control group was 48 points | The mean function in the intervention group was 12 points lower (18 to 6 lower) | 63 (1 study) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | Absolute risk difference 12% (18% to 6% fewer); relative per cent change3 19% (29% to 10% fewer) NNTB = 2 (2 to 5) |
|
Global assessment of treatment success | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | ‐ | See comment | No studies reported this outcome |
Active shoulder abduction Degrees Follow‐up: 4 weeks |
The mean active shoulder abduction in the control group was 70 degrees | The mean active shoulder abduction in the intervention group was 9 degrees higher (2 to 16 higher) | 63 (1 study) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | Absolute risk difference 5% (1% to 9% more); relative per cent change415% (3% to 27% more) | |
Quality of life | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | ‐ | See comment | No studies reported this outcome |
Adverse events | See comment | See comment | Not estimable | 63 (1 study) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate1 | No participant reported experiencing any adverse event |
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate. |
1 Sample size is small, yielding wide 95% CIs.
2 Baseline mean overall pain score of placebo group was 67.
3 Baseline mean function score of placebo group was 62.
4 Baseline mean active abduction of placebo group was 59.