Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):CD011324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011324

Summary of findings 3. Low‐level laser therapy (LLLT) plus exercise compared to exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).

Low‐level laser therapy (LLLT) plus exercise compared to placebo plus exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)
Patient or population: patients with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)
 Settings: physical therapy clinic in high‐income country
 Intervention: LLLT plus exercise
 Comparison: placebo laser therapy plus exercise
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Placebo laser therapy plus exercise LLLT plus exercise
Participant‐reported pain relief ≥ 30% See comment See comment Not estimable See comment No studies reported this outcome
Overall pain
0‐100 visual analogue scale (lower score = less pain)
Follow‐up: at 4th week of treatment
The mean overall pain in the control group was
 51 points The mean overall pain in the intervention group was
 19 points lower 
 (23 to 15 lower)   63
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Absolute risk difference 19% (23% to 15% fewer); relative per cent change2 28% (34% to 22% fewer)
NNTB = 1 (1 to 2)
Function 
 Shoulder Disabilty Questionnaire 0‐100 (lower scores = better function)
 Follow‐up: at 4th week of treatment The mean function in the control group was
 48 points The mean function in the intervention group was
 12 points lower 
 (18 to 6 lower)   63
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Absolute risk difference 12% (18% to 6% fewer); relative per cent change3 19% (29% to 10% fewer)
NNTB = 2 (2 to 5)
Global assessment of treatment success See comment See comment Not estimable See comment No studies reported this outcome
Active shoulder abduction
Degrees
Follow‐up: 4 weeks
The mean active shoulder abduction in the control group was
 70 degrees The mean active shoulder abduction in the intervention group was
 9 degrees higher 
 (2 to 16 higher)   63
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 Absolute risk difference 5% (1% to 9% more); relative per cent change415% (3% to 27% more)
Quality of life See comment See comment Not estimable See comment No studies reported this outcome
Adverse events See comment See comment Not estimable 63
 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate1 No participant reported experiencing any adverse event
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Sample size is small, yielding wide 95% CIs.

2 Baseline mean overall pain score of placebo group was 67.

3 Baseline mean function score of placebo group was 62.

4 Baseline mean active abduction of placebo group was 59.