Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 9;2014(7):CD009268. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009268.pub2

Nishizono 1994.

Methods Randomisation: randomised, no further details.
 Allocation: procedure not described.
 Blinding: n.i., probably open.
 Duration: 4 weeks.
 Design: n.i.,
 Location: multicentre.
 Setting: n.i.,
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (ICD‐10).
N = 109.
 Gender: n.i.,
 Age: n.i.,
 History: duration stable ‐ n.i., duration ill ‐ n.i., number of previous hospitalisations ‐ n.i., age at onset ‐ n.i., severity of illness ‐ n.i., baseline antipsychotic dose ‐ n.i.,
Interventions 1. Haloperidol: flexible dose, allowed dose range n.i., dose max. 21 mg/day. N = 57.
 2. Chlorpromazine: flexible dose, allowed dose range n.i., dose max. 450 mg/day. N = 52.
 
 Other medication: n.i..
Outcomes Response to treatment: at least 50% reduction in BPRS total score.
Unable to use:
Mental state: BPRS (incomplete data, no SD).
Global state: Global Assessment Scale (incomplete data, no SD).
Leaving the study early (no data available).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no further details.  
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Procedure not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk n.i., probably open.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk n.i., probably open.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not enough information to permit judgement about incomplete outcome data.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement about selective reporting.
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information about other sources of bias.