Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 27;9:17. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00404-0

Table 2.

Studies of the cost effectiveness of URGS and RGS in seriously ill children in intensive care units

Ref. Year Country Number of probands Dx rate Δ Mx RGS cost per proband Cost per Dx TAT Net savings per proband
53 2018 USA 42 43% 33% $16,063 $37,480 23 $18,741
73 2021 USA 184 40% 32% $9239 $23,602 3 $6294
6 2022 USA 61 33% n.d. $9758 $29,570 n.d. $11,286
93 2022 USA 38 45% 34% $6300 $14,082 14 ($1436)
80 2022 USA 65 40% n.d. $11,029 $27,573 12 $100,440
94 2022 Australia 40 53% 39% $8088 $15,406 3 $17,243
82 2023 USA 89 39% 27% $7564 $19,395 n.d. $4155
95 2023 USA 184 40% 32% $14,450 $36,125 3 $22,395
83 2023 USA 400 49% n.d. $8000 $16,326 6 n.d.
Median 40% 33% $9239 $25,588 $6 $14,265
Controls
80,97 2011, 2022 USA 2098 13% 6% $1887 $14,515 n.d. n.d.
72,83 2021, 2023 USA 400 27% n.d. $6500 $24,074 4 n.d.

Control study 75 featured 305 infants who received standard of care genetic testing for suspected genetic diseases (57% received chromosomal microarray ($1500), karyotype ($600) and newborn screening ($210), 31% received chromosomal microarray and newborn screening, and 1% received next generation sequencing based gene panels). Control study 78 featured 400 infants who received Quest NewbornDx, a next generation sequencing based gene panel.

Δ change, Dx diagnosis, Mx management, n.d. not done, TAT turnaround time.