Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Oncol Nurs Forum. 2023 Feb 17;50(2):201–214. doi: 10.1188/23.ONF.201-214

TABLE 4. Differences in Sociodemographic Characteristics Among Patient Subgroups Identified by Latent Profile Analyses (N = 300).

Profile 1
(N = 69)
Profile 2
(N = 128)
Profile 3
(N = 40)
Profile 4
(N = 47)
Profile 5
(N = 16)
Characteristic X¯ SD X¯ SD X¯ SD X¯ SD X¯ SD χ2 p
Age (years) 47.97 11 48.7 10.72 48.73 13.23 47.94 12.46 51.63 10.11 0.38 0.825
Characteristic: ref n % n % n % n % n % χ 2 p
Education: completed middle school 43 62 84 66 22 55 25 53 10 63 3.02 0.554
Gender: male 53 77 105 82 25 63 37 79 10 63 8.45 0.076
Insurance coverage: no 68 99 115 90 37 93 42 89 15 94 5.52 0.238
Locality: urban 41 59 71 55 22 55 25 53 7 44 1.42 0.84
Marital status: married 65 94 122 95 35 88 46 98 15 94 4.84 0.304
Monthly income: less than 50,000 INRa 65 94 110 86 35 88 39 83 14 88 4.04 0.401
Patient employment: part- or full-time 52 75 101 79 26 65 37 79 10 63 4.89 0.299
Patient is head of family: yes 51 74 105 82 27 68 36 77 9 56 7.73 0.102
Socioeconomic status: middle class or lower 55 80 75 59 24 60 32 68 11 69 9.64 0.047
a

1 U.S. dollar = 76 INR

INR—Indian rupee; profile 1—all mild; profile 2—dry dysphagic; profile 3—psychoneurologic dry dysphagic; profile 4—moist dysphagic; profile 5—psychoneurologic moist dysphagic; ref—reference

Note. Because of rounding, percentages may not total 100.