Category of study designs | Methodological quality criteria | Responses | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Can't tell | Comments | ||
Screening questions (for all types) | S1. Are there clear research questions? | √ | This study focuses on how and why patients practice self‐treatment. | ||
S2. Do the collected data allow to address the research questions? | √ | ||||
Further appraisal may not be feasible or appropriate when the answer is ‘No’ or ‘Can't tell’ to one or both screening questions. | |||||
Qualitative | 1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? | √ | What kind of qualitative research approaches did author use it without explanation | ||
2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? | √ | In‐depth semi‐structured interviews were conducted with participants, and the interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data from the interview transcripts were coded, and then a comparative analysis of the codes was undertaken by the researchers independently. | |||
3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data? | √ | The article uses the method of combining text and chart forms to fully explain the results of the research results. | |||
4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? | √ | For example, 32 participants were interviewed, their demographic characteristics and wound durations are shown in Table 1. | |||
5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation? | √ | The article makes full use of the data to the four subthemes and four themes of VLU patients with self‐treatment. |
Abbreviation: VLU, Venous leg ulcer.