Table 2.
Distribution of copy numbers of Rcr1 and disease severity index (DSI) in the T0–T2 generations of canola lines transformed with the different vectors
| Vector | T0 | T1 of T0 with single-copy insert | T2 of T1 with two copies | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 copy | 2 copies | 1 copy | 0 copy | Total no. plants | DSI (%) | 2 copies | 1 copy | 0 copy | Total no. plants | DSI (%) | |
| pHHIGS-AP1 | 9 | 15 | 32 | 13 | 60 | 21.7 ± 5.8b | 59 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0 ± 0a |
| pHHIGS-CLV3 | 7 | 14 | 30 | 14 | 58 | 24.1 ± 1.6b | 60 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 ± 0a |
| pHHIGS-Hsp18.2 | 10 | 14 | 33 | 13 | 60 | 21.7 ± 2.9b | 60 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 ± 0a |
| DH12075 | – | 0 | 0 | 60 | 60 | 100 ± 0c | 0 | 0 | 60 | 60 | 100 ± 0c |
Copy number was determined by ddPCR; DSI was determined through pathogenicity tests. Different letters indicate significant differences in DSI within the T1 and T2 generations, as determined using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test.