Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 15;11:1329788. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1329788

Table 2.

Physical activity, nutritional and behavioral data of undergraduate students at a university in southeastern Brazil in the first and third year of the COVID-19 pandemic, Vitória, 2020–2022.

Variables First year Third year p-value
N (%) N (%)
Physical activity 0.086
No 107 (42.6) 92 (36.7)
Yes 144 (57.4) 159 (63.3)
Body weight*a 64 ± 23 66 ± 25 0.002
BMI*a 23.01 ± 6.68 23.57 ± 7.50 0.003
Nutritional status 0.099
Underweight/Eutrophic 157 (62.5) 147 (58.6)
Overweight/Obese 94 (37.5) 104 (41.4)
Started cooking more 0.002
No 62 (24.7) 92 (36.7)
Yes 189 (75.3) 159 (63.3)
Ordered more food by delivery 0.001
No 179 (71.3) 145 (57.8)
Yes 72 (28.7) 106 (42.2)
Negative mood changes <0.001
No 52 (20.7) 85 (33.9)
Yes 199 (79.3) 166 (66.1)
Practice of restrictive diets <0.001
No 155 (61.8) 196 (78.1)
Yes 96 (38.2) 55 (21.9)
Concern about weight gain 0.374
No 94 (37.5) 102 (40.6)
Yes 157 (62.5) 149 (59.4)
Body perception 0.341
Adequate 42 (16.7) 31 (12.4)
Inadequate 209 (83.3) 220 (87.6)
Body dissatisfaction 0.280
No 31 (12.4) 39 (15.5)
Yes 220 (87.6) 212 (84.5)
Intuitive eating – Total score b 3.35 ± 0.58 3.45 ± 0.64 0.002
Intuitive eating – UPE Subscale*a 3.67 ± 0.84 3.83 ± 0.84 0.024
Intuitive eating – EPR Subscale*a 3.13 ± 1.38 3.38 ± 1.37 0.223
Intuitive eating – RHSC Subscale*a 3.33 ± 1.16 3.33 ± 1.37 0.173
Intuitive eating – B-FCC Subscale*a 3.33 ± 1.00 3.67 ± 1.00 0.001

McNemar test. aWilcoxon test. bPaired t-test. *Data expressed as p50 ± interquartile range. In bold: statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). BMI: body weight index. B-FCC: body-food choice congruence. EPR: eating for physical rather than emotional reasons. RHSC: reliance on hunger and satiety cues. UPE: unconditional permission to eat.