Table 5.
Multiple analysis according to nutritional status of undergraduate students at a university in southeastern Brazil in the first and third year of the COVID-19 pandemic, Vitória, 2020–2022.
| Variables | Crude | Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-value | OR (CI95%) | p-value | OR (CI95%) | |
| First year of the COVID-19 pandemic | ||||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | ||
| Female | 0.018 | 0.506 (0.288–0.890) | 0.002 | 0.265 (0.113–0.623) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Do not live maritally | 1 | 1 | ||
| Live maritally | <0.001 | 10.423 (3.818–28.453) | <0.001 | 21.229 (4.663–96.645) |
| Graduation area | ||||
| Health | 1 | 1 | ||
| No health | 0.018 | 1.947 (1.122–3.380) | 0.238 | 1.522 (0.758–3.054) |
| Practice of restrictive diets | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | <0.001 | 2.742 (1.612–4.665) | 0.095 | 1.854 (0.899–3.821) |
| Tobacco use | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.064 | 0.143 (0.018–1.124) | 0.047 | 0.082 (0.007–0.969) |
| Started cooking more | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.009 | 0.458 (0.255–0.820) | 0.431 | 0.739 (0.348–1.570) |
| Concern about weight gain | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | <0.001 | 5.937 (3.105–11.353) | <0.001 | 6.202 (2.645–14.543) |
| Body perception | ||||
| Adequate | 1 | 1 | ||
| Inadequate | 0.014 | 3.183 (1.266–8.008) | 0.074 | 3.002 (0.899–10.021) |
| Body dissatisfaction | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.002 | 6.584 (1.943–22.313) | 0.044 | 5.368 (1.045–27.574) |
| Intuitive eating – total score | 0.015 | 0.556 (0.348–0.891) | 0.634 | 0.844 (0.419–1.700) |
| Intuitive eating – UPE Subscale | 0.016 | 0.614 (0.414–0.913) | 0.540 | 1.197 (0.673–2.128) |
| Third year of the covid-19 pandemic | ||||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | ||
| Female | 0.017 | 0.504 (0.288–0.883) | <0.001 | 0.238 (0.109–0.521) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Do not live maritally | 1 | 1 | ||
| Live maritally | <0.001 | 6.673 (2.609–17.067) | <0.001 | 9.748 (3.045–31.207) |
| Practice of restrictive diets | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | <0.001 | 3.221 (1.728–6.004) | 0.008 | 2.887 (1.312–6.357) |
| Alcohol use | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.016 | 1.870 (1.124–3.108) | 0.123 | 1.675 (0.870–3.226) |
| Concern about weight gain | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | <0.001 | 5.298 (2.948–9.523) | <0.001 | 4.081 (1.920–8.677) |
| Body perception | ||||
| Adequate | 1 | 1 | ||
| Inadequate | <0.001 | 8.716 (3.003–25.293) | 0.023 | 3.984 (1.207–13.153) |
| Body dissatisfaction | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 0.001 | 4.728 (1.902–11.755) | 0.051 | 2.866 (0.995–8.257) |
| Intuitive eating – EPR subscale | 0.001 | 0.638 (0.485–0.841) | 0.802 | 0.948 (0.627–1.435) |
| Intuitive eating – RHSC subscale | <0.001 | 0.583 (0.447–0.759) | 0.092 | 0.729 (0.505–1.053) |
| Intuitive eating – B-FCC subscale | <0.001 | 0.529 (0.381–0.732) | 0.015 | 0.567 (0.360–0.894) |
Binary logistic regression crude and adjusted. Hosmer e Lemeshow test: First year—0.416; Third year—0.481. R square nagelkerke: first year—0.454; third year—0.475. In bold: statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). B-FCC: body-food choice congruence. EPR: eating for physical rather than emotional reasons. RHSC: reliance on hunger and satiety cues. UPE: unconditional permission to eat. OR: odds ratio. CI: confidence interval.