Table 2.

This table provides full results of QualSyst quality assessment of included publications

		Study
Criteria	Prasanna (2011) [35]	Esmaeili (2011) [34]	McCarthy (2014) [33]	Esmaeili (2015) [32]	Martin (2018) [31]	Esmaeili (2018) [30]	Brodbeck (2019) [29]	Alshqaqeeq (2020) [28]	Heye (2020) [14]	Hainc (2020) [13]	Büttner (2021) [18]	Peters (2021) [23]	McAlister (2022) [27]	Brown (2022) [26]	Gendy (2022) [24]	Woolen (2023) [25]
Question/objective sufficiently described?	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Study design evident and appropriate?	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	2
Context for the study clear?	2	2	2	2	1	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Connection to a theoretical framework/wider body of knowledge?	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Sampling strategy described, relevant, and justified?	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	1	2	2	2	2	2
Data collection methods clearly described and systematic?	2	1	1	1	1	1	0	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Data analysis clearly described and systematic?	2	1	1	1	1	1	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Use of verification procedure(s) to establish credibility?	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	2	1	1	1	2	2	1	2
Conclusions supported by the results?	1	1	2	2	1	2	1	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2
Reflexivity of the account?	2	2	2	1	1	1	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	1	2
Total (0–20)	18 (90%)	16 (80%)	17 (85%)	16 (80%)	14 (70%)	16 (80%)	10 (50%)	18 (90%)	20 (100%)	19 (95%)	17 (85%)	19 (95%)	20 (100%)	20 (100%)	18 (90%)	20 (100%)