Table 3.
Free recall day 30.
| Independent variables/predictors | Beta coefficient | p-value | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| tDCS group | 0.578 | < 0.001 | 440.8 |
| Education | 0.021 | 0.186 | 457.5 |
| CRI-total score | 0.004 | 0.337 | 458.4 |
| CRI-education | 0.004 | 0.365 | 458.5 |
| CRI-working activity | 0.001 | 0.895 | 459.3 |
| CRI-leisure time | 0.003 | 0.413 | 458.6 |
| tDCS timing | 0.295 (Global) | 458.9 | |
| 0.214 (REC vs. CON) | 0.618 (REC vs. CON) | ||
| − 0.025 (ENC vs. CON) | 1 (ENC vs. CON) | ||
| − 0.238 (ENC vs. REC) | 0.484 (ENC vs. REC) | ||
| Encoding performance | 0.114 | < 0.001 | 439.1 |
| Age | 0.005 | 0.737 | 459.2 |
tDCS Group sham reference category, CRI cognitive reserve index, ENC during encoding, CON during consolidation, REC during reconsolidation.
Significant results shown in bold. P-values of pairwise comparisons for tDCS Timing were adjusted using Bonferroni correction.