Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 1;14:04005. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04005

Table 2.

Association between tuberculosis and the number of different types of psychotic experiences estimated by multivariable multinomial logistic regression*

Total number of different types of psychotic experiences (outcome)

1 vs 0
2 vs 0
≥3 vs 0
Characteristic
OR (95% CI)
P-value
OR (95% CI)
P-value
OR (95% CI)
P-value
Tuberculosis – yes vs no
1.84 (1.41–1.00)
<0.001
2.18 (1.58–3.03)
<0.001
3.79 (2.88–4.98*
<0.001
Age in years, per unit increase
1.00 (0.99–1.00)
<0.05
1.00 (0.99–1.00)
NS
1.00 (1.00–1.00)
NS
Sex – women vs Men
1.33 (1.21–1.46)
<0.001
1.36 (1.19–1.56)
<0.001
1.54 (1.23–1.92)
<0.001
Wealth






Poorest
1.00

1.00

1.00

Poorer
1.16 (1.01–1.33)
<0.05
1.09 (0.94–1.27)
NS
0.84 (0.71–0.98)
<0.05
Middle
0.99 (0.87–1.13)
NS
1.03 (0.87–1.22)
NS
0.82 (0.69–0.96)
<0.05
Richer
1.01 (0.87–1.17)
NS
0.89 (0.74–1.07)
NS
0.82 (0.59–1.13)
NS
Richest
0.93 (0.79–1.10)
NS
0.95 (0.78–1.16)
NS
0.55 (0.40–0.075)
<0.001
Education






No formal
1.00

1.00

1.00

Primary
1.29 (1.12–1.47)
<0.001
1.12 (0.95–1.32)
NS
1.15 (0.96–1.37)
NS
Secondary
1.27 (1.06–1.51)
<0.01
1.01 (0.82–1.25)
NS
0.78 (0.62–0.99)
<0.05
Tertiary
1.00 (0.80–1.26)
NS
0.85 (0.63–1.17)
NS
1.11 (0.49–2.49)
NS
Diabetes – yes vs no
1.66 (1.37–2.02)
<0.001
1.37 (1.03–1.82)
<0.05
2.32 (1.82–2.95)
<0.001
Setting – urban vs rural
1.04 (0.91–1.19)
NS
1.07 (0.92–1.26)
NS
1.04 (0.87–1.25)
NS
Current smoking – yes vs no
1.19 (1.07–1.31)
<0.01
1.24 (1.07–1.43)
<0.01
1.37 (1.13–1.66)
<0.01
Alcohol consumption






Lifetime abstainer
1.00

1.00

1.00

Non-heavy
1.30 (1.15–1.48)
<0.001
1.39 (1.20–1.62)
<0.001
1.26 (1.04–1.52)
<0.05
Infrequent heavy
1.33 (1.07–1-66)
<0.05
1.83 (1.40–2.40)
<0.001
1.92 (1.41–2.63)
<0.001
Frequent heavy 1.25 (0.85–1.82) NS 1.71 (1.07–2.76) <0.05 1.61 (0.98–2.64) NS

CI – confidence interval, NS – not significant, OR – odds ratio

*Model is mutually adjusted for all variables in the table and country.