Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;34(1):130–143. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1944420

Table 3.

Mean Values (± SD) on Individual Difference Measures in Order of Administration, by Gender, Execution, and Advertisement Version.

  Men
Women
  April
September
April
September
  “Pornography” “Photography” “Pornography” “Photography” “Pornography” “Photography” “Pornography” “Photography”
SOS 81.20a (17.41) 79.35a (18.90) 78.75a (17.66) 87.29a (15.83) 70.33b (16.59) 65.81b,c (15.26) 66.35b,c (23.11) 62.69c (20.95)
PUF 4.04d (1.11) 3.85d (0.98) 3.67d (1.13) 3.88d (0.60) 2.03e (0.62) 1.95e (0.91) 2.06e (0.94) 1.80e (0.91)
OtE 3.74g,h,i (0.57) 3.61f,g (0.62) 3.51f (0.39) 3.62f,g,h (0.53) 3.91i (0.47) 3.59f,g (0.53) 3.81h,i (0.55) 3.72g,h,i (0.51)

Notes. SOS: erotophilia (Fisher et al., 1998), PUF: pornography use frequency, OtE: openness to experience (DeYoung et al., 2007) for all scales greater scores indicate greater such frequency/possession of the trait. In April men’s n’s 44–45 for ‘Pornography’ and 40 for “Photography”: women's 30 for “Pornography”, and 37 for “Photography”. In September men’s n = 24 for “Pornography” and 17 for “Photography”: women’s 53–54 for “Pornography” and 60–61 for “Photography”. Where there is not at least one subscript in common between values within a measure, they differ at the p<.10 or marginally significant level (see text for exact p-, t-, and Cohen’s d-values associated with significantly different values). All t-tests two-tailed in this table, for consistency within the table: see text for all significant one-tailed t-test results where predictions concerning individual difference measures (all of which were directional) were made.