Table 3.

Biserial intercorrelations among the Sexual Narcissism Scale and Sexual Initiation Strategies Scale.

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Gendera	–
2. Total SNS	−.14**	–			.
3.SNS: sexual exploitation	−.21**	.83**	–
4. SNS: sexual entitlement	−.06	.83**	.68**	–
5. SNS: low sexual empathy	−.10*	.45**	.44**	.28**	–
6. SNS: sexual skill	−.05	.57**	.21**	.27**	−.23**	–			.
7. SISS: enticementb	−.03	.22**	.28**	.15**	.15**	.06	–		.		.
8. SISS: pressureb	−.12**	.28**	.34**	.23**	.14**	.06	.33**	–
9. SISS: no opportunity to objectb	.09*	.24**	.21**	.23**	.08	.12**	.14**	.13**	–	.
10. SISS: explicitly non-consensualb	−.10*	.17**	.17**	.17**	.01	.09*	.17**	.15**	.16**	–
11. SISS: intoxicationb	−.06	.15**	.11*	.16**	.04	.08	.17**	.19**	−.01	.15**	–

Notes. Because individuals with missing data were excluded on a pairwise basis correlations range from 455 to 508. SNS: Sexual Narcissism Scale (Widman & McNulty, 2010); SISS: Sexual Initiation Strategies Scale (Peterson, 2023).

^a 0 = men and 1 = women.

^b 0 = no endorsement of items in that category and 1 = at least one item in that category endorsed.

^***p < .001; **p < .01; *p < .05.