Table 3.
Unstandardized beta coefficients from regression models of COVID-19 related stress predicting sexual outcomes and relationship satisfaction at T1.
SDI solitary desire | SDI dyadic desire | SBF solitary behaviors | SBF dyadic behaviors | Sexual compliancea | Sexual coercion | RAS relationship satisfaction | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model with control variables only | r2 = .069 F = 9.91 p < .001 | r2 = .055 F = 7.87 p < .001 | r2 = .114 F = 16.10 p < .001 | r2 = .016 F = 1.95 p = .070 | r2 = .020 F = 2.25 p = .037 | r2 = .012 F = .91 p = .484 | r2 = .001 F = 1.08 p = .376 |
Ethnicity (White = 0, POC = 1) B(SE) | .066 (.450) | .536 (.878) | −.034 (.129) | −.125 (.146) | .039 (.128) | −.173 (.606) | −.050 (.070) |
Sex (Male = 0, Female = 1) B(SE) | −2.375 (.463)*** | −5.349 (.905)*** | −1.005 (.133)*** | −.082 (.151) | −.415 (.133)** | −1.163 (.627) | .041 (.074) |
Education B(SE) | .102 (.155) | .073 (.303) | −.034 (.044) | .045 (.050) | .011 (.045) | −.042 (.213) | .017 (.024) |
Income B(SE) | −.039 (.061) | −.210 (.120)† | −.037 (.018)* | .023 (.020) | .005 (.018) | −.066 (.085) | .020 (.010) |
Sexual orientation B(SE) (Heterosexual = 0, Gay/Lesbian = 1) |
2.323 (.625)*** | −.838 (1.222) | .528 (.176)** | −.588 (.202)** | −.016 (.176) | .605 (.871) | .033 (.105) |
Sexual orientation B(SE)
(Heterosexual = 0, Other = 1) |
1.076 (.447)* | −1.447 (.874) | .330 (.127)** | −.116 (.144) | −.100 (.127) | .269 (.603) | .029 (.070) |
Model with control variables, COVID-19 related stress and live-in partner status | Δr2 = .008 ΔF = 3.47 p = .032 | Δr2 =.052 ΔF = 23.62 p < .001 | Δr2 = .054 ΔF = 24.22 p < .001 | Δr2 =.171 ΔF = 75.89 p < .001 | Δr2 = .010 ΔF = 3.37 p = .035 | Δr2 = .026 ΔF = 6.24 p = .002 | Δr2 = .029 ΔF = 8.19 p < .001 |
Stress B(SE) | .304 (.167) | 1.364 (.317)*** | .062 (.046) | −.094 (.049) | .028 (.047) | .635 (.224)** | −.097 (.026)*** |
Live-in partner B(SE)
(No= 0, Yes = 1) |
−.859 (.425)* | −4.597 (.812)*** | −.816 (.118)*** | 1.541 (.125)*** | −.308 (.120)* | 1.113 (.575) | .124 (.066) |
Model with control variables, COVID-19 related stress and live-in partner status and their interaction | Δr2 = .005 ΔF = 4.17 p = .042 | Δr2 =.001 ΔF = 14.60 p < .001 | Δr2 = .001 ΔF = 1.28 p = .258 | Δr2 =.000 ΔF = .02 p = .897 | Δr2 = .000 ΔF = .24 p = .628 | Δr2 = .021 ΔF = 10.15 p = .002 | Δr2 = .001 ΔF = .63 p = .428 |
Stress × Live-in partner status | .673 (.330)* | −.511 (.629) | .104 (.091) | .013 (.098) | −.045 (.092) | 1.45 (.455)** | −.043 (.054) |
SDI: Sexual Desire Inventory; SBF: Sexual Behavior Frequency; RAS: Relationship Assessment Scale; B(SE): Unstandardized beta coefficient and standard error.
aHigher scores indicate lower compliance.
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.