Table 4.

Multivariable models predicting gambling harm to children items: Coefficients and [95% CIs] (Bolded Cells Indicate p < .05)

Predictor variables	Physical abuse	Verbal abuse	Left unsupervised	Not enough money	Witness violence	Child welfare	Emotional distress	Relation-ship problems
Parent problem gambling severity	0.41 [0.11, 0.72]	0.48 [0.27, 0.69]	0.32 [0.13, 0.51]	0.63 [0.39, 0.86]	0.43 [0.20, 0.66]	0.34 [-0.17, 0.85]	1.06 [0.72, 1.39]	0.66 [0.42, 0.91]
Two gambling parents (ref one)	0.50 [− 0.66, 1.66]	− 0.34 [− 1.33, 0.64]	1.32 [0.31, 2.33]	− 0.08 [− 1.10, 0.94]	− 0.04 [− 1.00, 0.93]	0.21 [− 2.34, 2.29]	− 0.14 [− 1.52, 1.24]	0.09 [− 1.05, 1.22]
Responsive parenting	− 1.00 [− 1.65, − 0.35]	− 0.80 [− 1.27, 0.34]	− 0.80 [− 1.25, 0.35]	− 0.56 [− 1.02, − 0.10]	− 0.62 [− 1.08, − 0.17]	0.17 [− 0.70, 1.00]	− 0,58 [− 1.18, 0.03]	− 1.31 [− 1.91, − 0.71]
Primary gambling parent gender (ref female)	0.56 [− 0.54. 1.66]	− 0.30 [− 1.16, 0.56]	− 0.27 [− 1.12, 0.58]	0.50 [− 0.40, 1.41]	0.73 [− 0.17, 1.62]	1.00 [− 1.00, 3.00]	− 0.34 [− 1.53, 0.85]	1.52 [− 0.19, 1.28]
Prob > chi2	0.0003	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.2608	0.0000	0.0000
Pseudo R2	0.2281	0.2996	0.2626	0.3268	0.2029	0.1536	0.5612	0.4347

Models are adjusted for participant age, gender, Indigenous status and country of birth