Table 4.
Effect of concurrent training associated with moderate walnut consumption on bipedal with dual-task parameters
| Variables | Groups | Times | Anova | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre (M ± SD) |
Post (M ± SD) |
Training Effect F(1,18), p, ηp2 |
Group Effect F(1,18), p, ηp2 |
Interaction F(1,18), p, ηp2 |
||
| Copx BI EO (mm) |
CT CTW |
300.1 ± 110. 340.3 ± 147.8 | 276.6 ± 96.01 249.8 ± 103.3* | 27.2, < 0.01, .6 | NS | 9.4, < 0.01, .34 |
| Copy BI EO (mm) |
CT CTW |
419.6 ± 118.8 467.4 ± 125.1 | 419.1 ± 95.4 398.6 ± 101.0* | 19.7, <0 .01, .5 | NS | 5.4, < 0.05, .24 |
| Copx BI EC (mm) |
CT CTW |
304.5 ± 124.3 401 ± 190.63 | 291.0 ± 116.1 307.6 ± 127.2* | 8.3, < 0.01, .3 | NS | 4.6, < 0.05, .2 |
| Copy BI EC (mm) |
CT CTW |
524.9 ± 195.6 577.5 ± 162.4 | 501.2 ± 157.2 479.3 ± 124.3* | 11.4 < 0.01, .4 | NS | NS |
CT training group, CTW training + walnut, Pre before intervention, Post 48 h after intervention, M ± SD mean ± standard deviation, copx center of pressure medio-lateral length, copy center of pressure antero-posterior length, BI bipedal, EO eyes open, EC eyes closed, *significant difference with pre-intervention (p < 0.05)