Table 8.
Stomatal conductance in four rice varieties under two weather scenarios during flowering under LHS and NWS.
| Time | Variety | Stomatal conductance (mmol m-2 s-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LHS | NWS | ||
| 10 am | Mianhui101 | 981.4 ± 71.6b** | 563.8 ± 57.4b |
| IR64 | 1003.8 ± 119.8b** | 540.3 ± 48.0b | |
| Quanliangyou681 | 1137.5 ± 42.2a** | 612.3 ± 31.5a | |
| SDWG005 | 1136.5 ± 101.7a** | 599.3 ± 85.4a | |
| 4 pm | Mianhui101 | 335.3 ± 76.8c** | 533.4 ± 20.7b |
| IR64 | 400.8 ± 34.2b** | 523.4 ± 54.4b | |
| Quanliangyou681 | 503.1 ± 75.1a* | 571.1 ± 19.9a | |
| SDWG005 | 500.1 ± 86.5a* | 574.6 ± 57.1a | |
** and * indicate significant differences at P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively, between a variety in the long-term heat scenario (LHS) and the same variety under the normal weather scenario (NWS).
Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between varieties under the same weather scenario at the P<0.05 level using Tukey’s test (n=15).