Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep 1;230(3):364.e1–364.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.029

Table 2.

Prevalence and relative risk of SMM during the delivery hospitalization among individuals with stillbirth versus live birth deliveries in California, Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina

Characteristics Cases (Cases per 10,000 deliveries) Risk Ratio (95% CI)
Stillbirth
N=35,012
Live birth
N=8,659,900
Unadjusted RR Adjusted RRa Adjusted RR including comorbidity indexb Adjusted RR including obstetric factorsc
SMM 2768 (791) 133415 (154) 5.1 (4.9, 5.3) 3.8 (3.7, 3.9) 1.6 (1.5, 1.8) 3.5 (3.3, 3.6)
Non-transfusion SMM 1758 (502) 58989 (68) 7.4 (7.0, 7.7) 5.1 (4.8, 5.3) 2.0 (1.8, 2.3) 4.5 (4.3, 4.7)
a

Adjusted for: birth year, state, insurance, education, race/ethnicity, maternal age, and prenatal care adequacy.

b

Adjusted for: birth year, state, insurance, education, race/ethnicity, maternal age, prenatal care adequacy, and obstetric comorbidity index.

c

Adjusted for: birth year, state, insurance, education, race/ethnicity, maternal age, prenatal care adequacy, preexisting diabetes, preexisting hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and gestational hypertension.