Table 7. IL-6/IL-10 ratio based on anthropometric.
| Markers | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | ΔIL-10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6/IL-10 based on LAZ/HAZ categories | |||
| - Normo-stature (n = 52) | 0.32 ± 0.16 | 0.43 ± 0.11 | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
| - Stunted (n = 13) | 0.39 ± 0.38 | 0.45 ± 0.13 | 0.07 ± 0.41 |
| - Severely stunted (n = 10) | 0.30 ± 0.27 | 0.46 ± 0.11 | 0.15 ± 0.27 |
| p value | 0.390 2 | 0.764 1 | 0.698 1 |
| IL-6/IL-10 based on WAZ categories | |||
| - Weight faltering (normo-weight (n = 56) | 0.34 ± 0.24 | 0.44 ± 0.16 | 0.10 ± 0.26 |
| - Underweight (n = 15) | 0.30 ± 0.16 | 0.43 ± 0.11 | 0.12 ± 0.13 |
| - severely underweight (n = 4) | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.16 | 0.28 ± 0.18 |
| p value | 0.141 2 | 0.809 1 | 0.340 1 |
| IL-6/IL-10 based on WLZ/WHZ categories | |||
| - Good nutritional status (n = 64) | 0.33 ± 0.23 | 0.44 ± 0.11 | 0.11 ± 0.25 |
| - Wasted (n = 9) | 0.28 ± 0.14 | 0.45 ± 0.12 | 0.17 ± 0.18 |
| - Severely wasted (n = 2) | 0.44 ± 0.31 | 0.49 ± 0.16 | 0.05 ± 0.15 |
| p value | 0.675 2 | 0.804 1 | 0.739 1 |
Note: WAZ = weight-for-age z-score; LAZ = length-for-age z-score; HAZ = height-for-age z-score; WLZ = weight-for-length z-score; WHZ = weight-for-height z-score.
1
One-way ANOVA.
2
Kruskal-Wallis.