Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 29;7(2):e240007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007

Table 2. Numbers of CRC Cases and CRC Deaths Prevented After Sigmoidoscopy or Colonoscopy Screening Compared With Usual Care in Intention-to-Treat Analysesa.

CRC Compared with usual care Colonoscopy screening compared with sigmoidoscopy
As observed in sigmoidoscopy trials As estimated for colonoscopy
No. of events prevented (95% CI) NNS (95% CI)b No. of events prevented (95% CI) NNS (95% CI)b Additional No. of events prevented (95% CI) Numbers needed to switch (95% CI)b
Incidence
All individuals 37 (30-44) 188 (158-231) 50 (42-58) 139 (118-164) 12 (10-14) 560 (486-661)
Women 20 (11-28) 352 (243-638) 31 (21-42) 218 (161-336) 11 (8-14) 610 (474-853)
Men 56 (46-67) 126 (106-155) 70 (59-82) 100 (85-120) 13 (10-15) 541 (458-661)
Mortality
All individuals 11 (7-14) 598 (450-888) 15 (11-19) 415 (327-567) 4 (3-5) 1611 (1275-2188)
Women 4 (0-9) 1478 (733-infinity) 8 (2-13) 807 (478-2572) 3 (1-4) 2248 (1376-6140)
Men 18 (12-23) 367 (280-533) 23 (17-29) 281 (222-383) 5 (4-6) 1300 (1017-1798)

Abbreviations: CRC, colorectal cancer; NNS, number needed to invite to screening.

a

Numbers are presented per 100 000 person-years; the number of additional events prevented is not exactly the difference of colonoscopy effectiveness minus sigmoidoscopy effectiveness because the trial weights were slightly different.

b

Number of individuals who need to switch screening method (from sigmoidoscopy to colonoscopy) to prevent 1 additional event.