Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 7;6:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-88

Table 2.

Evaluation results for the NCB14 dataset.

Textractor NLProt Union
PubMedID Correct Incorrect Precision Rel. Recall Correct Incorrect Precision Rel. Recall Correct

12629548 41 19 68% 67% 37 77 32% 59% 63
12629549 38 3 93% 84% 32 79 29% 40% 50
12640462 23 17 58% 100% 1 13 7% 4% 23
12640463 18 17 51% 36% 46 77 37% 87% 53
12640464 67 18 79% 72% 50 26 66% 50% 100
12669071 14 8 64% 54% 19 35 35% 73% 26
12669072 14 3 82% 65% 18 27 40% 51% 26
12669073 27 1 96% 81% 25 31 45% 53% 39
12669075 19 7 73% 73% 16 26 38% 47% 26
12669077 19 5 79% 73% 16 38 30% 39% 28
12669082 86 26 77% 68% 82 87 49% 65% 126
12669083 64 13 83% 58% 81 74 52% 72% 112
12679784 25 7 78% 58% 26 37 41% 60% 43
12692559 54 26 68% 60% 67 77 47% 55% 99

micro-evaluation 509 170 75% 63% 516 704 42% 63% 814
macro-evaluation 75% 67% 39% 54%