Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Psychol. 2015 Jul 24;50(6):440–450. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12196

TABLE 1.

Time 6 observed variables (means or percentages) by BII trajectory class

BII trajectory class (count, percentage of sample)

Variable Range of possible scores Lower (n = 173; 57.3%) Higher (n = 129; 42.7%) B (compared to low BII class)a
Self-esteem 10–50 28.85 (6.89) 30.94 (6.75) B = 1.93, p < .03
Optimism 5–30 21.93 (5.81) 25.32 (5.41) B = 2.78, p < .001
Prosocial behaviour 19–95 52.81 (12.65) 57.60 (16.64) B = 4.16, p < .03
Parental involvement 13–52 38.86 (10.62) 45.27 (9.87) B = 4.60, p < .001
Positive parenting 9–27 21.42 (6.95) 23.63 (8.07) B = 1.60, p = .07
Parent–adolescent communication 20–100 68.34 (12.80) 73.45 (13.98) B = 3.66, p < .03
Family communication 3–12 8.95 (2.13) 9.95 (2.10) B = 0.81, p < .005

BII = bicultural identity integration.

a

Adjusted for site, gender and years in US, as well as baseline levels of the dependent variable.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure