Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 19;34(2):166–174. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000952

Table 2.

ORR according to RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 at follow-up 1, 2 and 3; n = 10

Pat_no Follow-up 1* Follow-up 2 Follow-up 3 BOR
RECIST 1.1 PERCIST 1.0 RECIST 1.1 PERCIST 1.0 RECIST 1.1 PERCIST RECIST 1.1 PERCIST 1.0
10 PD SMD PD SMD PD PMD PD SMD
11 PD NA PD PMD PD PMD PD PMD
12 PD PMD NA NA NA NA PD PMD
13 PD SMD PD PMD NA NA PD SMD
14 PD PMD PD PMD NA NA PD PMD
15 PD PMD PD PMD NA NA PD PMD
16 PD PMD PD PMD PD PMD PD PMD
17 SD PMR PR PMD PR PMD PR PMR
18 PD SMD PD SMD PD SMD PD SMD
19 PD SMD PD NA NA NA PD SMD
Comparisons
n 9 8 5 10
Cohen’s κ 0 0.091 0.111 0.134
P-value 0.037 1 1 1

Follow-up 1 corresponded to around 3 months after the treatment start, follow-up 2–6 months and follow-up 3–9 months after treatment start. BOR – best overall response. Cohen’s k and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were calculated to determine agreements and differences between the two criteria protocols.

NA, not available; PD, progressive disease; PMD, progressive metabolic disease; PMR, partial metabolic response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; SMD, stable metabolic disease.