Table 2.
VISSIM simulation calibration results with collected data.
| Entry (Drive out) | Entry (Drive in) | Flow | Investigated Capacity (veh/h) | Simulated Capacity (veh/h) | MAPE for each flow (%) | MAPE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 341 | 346 | 1.35% | 0.39% |
| 3 | 2 | 83 | 94 | 12.77% | ||
| 4 | 3 | 112 | 122 | 9.29% | ||
| 5 | 4 | 92 | 94 | 1.74% | ||
| 2 | 1 | 5 | 172 | 180 | 4.65% | |
| 3 | 6 | 36 | 36 | 0.00% | ||
| 4 | 7 | 324 | 302 | −6.67% | ||
| 5 | 8 | 666 | 670 | 0.54% | ||
| 3 | 1 | 9 | 97 | 94 | −3.51% | |
| 2 | 10 | 28 | 29 | 2.86% | ||
| 4 | 11 | 12 | 10 | −16.67% | ||
| 5 | 12 | 40 | 46 | 15.00% | ||
| 4 | 1 | 13 | 124 | 108 | −12.90% | |
| 2 | 14 | 220 | 202 | −8.36% | ||
| 3 | 15 | 36 | 36 | 0.00% | ||
| 5 | 16 | 72 | 72 | 0.00% | ||
| 5 | 1 | 17 | 161 | 161 | 11.80% | |
| 2 | 18 | 543 | 543 | 0.77% | ||
| 3 | 19 | 47 | 47 | −8.09% | ||
| 4 | 20 | 70 | 70 | 13.14% |