Table 2.
Representative studies of proactive intervention of animals on the bioeffects of EMR
| EMR Frequency | Dose of EMR | Modulation pattern | Exposure duration | Animals | Bioeffect of EMR | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static electric field | ∼100 V/m | – | – | Bumblebees | Preference in binary choice | Clarke77 |
| Static magnetic field | 1-50 μT | Drosophila | Preference in binary choice | Gegear, and Gegear et al. 47,48 | ||
| 500 μT | Disruption of climbing | Fedele et al. 49 | ||||
| 0, 90, 220, 300, 500 μT | No magnetosensing behavior | Bassetto et al. 50 | ||||
| 44-189 μT | Pigeons | Preference in binary choice | Mora et al. 88 | |||
| 45 μT (Geomagnetic level), 200 μT | 0-72 h | Planarians | Decreased blastema sizes | Van Huizen et al. 46 | ||
| Static/60 Hz/Static +60 Hz magnetic field | DC: 51.1, 78.4 μT AC: peak 1.0–80.0 μT |
– | 12 days | Regeneration anomalies with tumor-like protuberances | Jenrow et al. 41 | |
| AC magnetic field: FM: 0.4–167 Hz GM: 0.065–500 Hz |
FM: 0.1–2.5 μT GM: 0.5–5 μT |
FM: frequency-modulated pulses GM: wideband pulses |
6.5 h/day FM for 1–5 days, 6.5 h/day GM for 1–5 days |
Dissolution of planarian | Murugan et al. 44 | |
| 50 Hz magnetic field | 400 μT | Sinusoidal | 24 h/day for 60 days | Rats | Improved the cognitive and pathological symptoms of AD | Liu, and Zuo 58,66 |
| 2.4 mT | 2 h | Altered brain lipid profile | Martínez-Sámano et al. 67 | |||
| 1.6 mT | 2-48 h | Honeybees | Altered structure of chemical compounds | Koziorowska et al. 78 | ||
| Static magnetic field + 0.65/1.315/2.63 MHz |
DC: 46, 92 μT, EMR: 5, 15, 48, 150 nT |
– | European robins | Disorientation of flight | Ritz et al. 82 | |
| 50 kHz - 5 MHz | Peak intensity 0.1–50 nT | Wideband noise | Engels et al. 83 | |||
| 200 kHz | 2 V/cm | Sinusoidal | 6 days | Mice | Inhibited growth of tumors | Kirson et al. 54 |
| 900 MHz | 90 mW/kg | 12 h/day for 7 days | DNA damage in sperm | Aitken et al. 53 | ||
| 0.9 W/kg | GSM | 2 h/day for 35 days | Rats | Altered sperm cells | Kesari et al. 55 | |
| 1 ± 0.4 mW/cm2 SAR 2 W/kg | Sinusoidal | 1 h/day for 21 days during the gestation period | Neuronal damage in hippocampus | Erdem Koç et al. 61 | ||
| 1 ± 0.4 mW/cm2 SAR 2 W/kg | Sinusoidal | 1 h/day between GD 1 to the end of gestation | Increased total kidney volume; decreased the numbers of glomeruli | Ulubay et al. 57 | ||
| 915 MHz | Continuous wave: 3 W Pulse: 1–10 W |
Sinusoidal, 8-215 Hz pulse modulation |
2 h | Increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier | Persson et al. 52 | |
| 900 MHz | 4.5–13.4 V/m; SAR: 0.01 W/kg | Sinusoidal | 1 h/day for 25 days | Altered cerebellar morphology & reduced number of neurons | Aslan et al. 62 | |
| SAR: 1.5, 3.0, 6.0 W/kg | GSM, CDMA; cycle of 10-min on and 10-min off | 18 h/day from prenatal life to 106 weeks after birth | Increased incidences of Schwannomas and Schwann cells hyperplasia, and malignant glial tumors | Wyde et al. 65 | ||
| 1.8 GHz | 0, 5, 25, 50 V/m SAR: 0.1, 0.03, 0.001 W/kg |
GSM | 19 h/day from prenatal life to natural death | Falcioni et al. 64 | ||
| 900 MHz | 0.25, 0.5 W/kg | GSM | 45 min/day 5 days/week from postnatal day 35 to natural death | No significant difference | Ouadah et al. 69 | |
| 1.9 GHz | 3.2 V/m | DECT | 24 h/day for 8 weeks | Lizards | Suppressed inflammatory responses | Mina et al. 101 |
| 2.4 GHz | 8 W | Sinusoidal, 100 Hz pulse modulation | 1-9 days | Mice | Increased time of wakefulness | Liu et al. 70 |
| 2.45 GHz | – | Wi-Fi | 24 h/day for 10 weeks | Rats | Altered oxidative defense system | Kamali et al. 68 |
| 2 h/day along gestation till parturition | Behavioral and biochemical impairments | Othman et al. 63 | ||||
| 1.8 GHz, 1.9 GHz, 2.4 GHz | GSM: 5.53 V/m – 50 nT; DECT: 3.75 V/m; Wi-Fi: 2.1 V/m | GSM, DECT, Wi-Fi | 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 24 h | C. elegance | No statistically significant differences | Fasseas et al. 36 |