Ease of use19–22
The end users of the resource perceive the resource to be easy to understand and use.
The language is appropriate for the intended audience.
The resource has an engaging structure that improves the likelihood of use.
|
Evaluate the resource for ease of use. Criteria include:− The language is simple and easy to read.− The format/structure is easy to follow.− The content is simple/not overly complex.− Tools are available to support use.− The resource is translated or made available in the local language or preferred language of the end user.
Pilot test language and format with local staff.
Develop additional implementation tools to support use.
Use participatory and collaborative strategies to engage users in resource design.
|
|
|
Evaluate the resource for value added. Criteria include:− The resource is higher quality than alternatives.− The resource helps improve work.− The resource is compatible with work responsibilities.− The resource is not duplicative of other resources.
Pilot test the resource with local workflows.
|
Effectiveness21,22
The resource was developed or is supported by a trusted source.
The resource delivers on its promises (it appropriately addresses what it claims to address).
The resource presents evidence of efficacy of the content or recommendations.
The resource makes recommendations based on evidence.
|
|
Adaptable with local input19–21,23
The resource acknowledges that adaptations may be needed to enable implementation in different contexts.
The resource allows for some modification.
The resource provides guidance on how adaptations should be made.
|
Evaluate whether the resource allows for adaptation.
Evaluate whether the resource provides guidance on how modifications can be made.
Seek input from local users to adapt the resource.
Identify local adaptations that may be helpful.
Adapt the resource to the local context if appropriate.
|