TABLE 2.
How Learning From the ColaLife Operational Trial in Zambia Influenced Costing and Pricing for Scale-Up
| Innovation/Aspect | Trial Learning/Evidence | Action |
|---|---|---|
| “Price minus” costing: value-chain price points for the product and ex-factory target price derived from willingness to pay and expected margins. | Margins and RRP were acceptable to retailers, wholesalers, and end users.17 | Trial pricing and margins retained for scale-up; ex-factory subsidy successfully removed (see below). |
| Restrict use of subsidy to the reduction of the ex-factory price to allow expected margins and achieve a retail price that matched willingness to pay. | Design modifications based on trial findings (Table 1) reduced the cost of production. | Manufacturer deployed savings to reduce the ex-factory price and eliminate the subsidy, to avoid having to change the price points, value chain, and market expectations established during the trial. |
| Through the learning and steering group, involve the MOH in understanding the process of developing a private-sector product and its benefits. | Product benefits fully understood by the MOH. | Toward the end of the scale-up phase, the MOH commissioned a government-branded version of the co-pack for distribution, free of charge, through health centers. |
| Use of discount vouchers during the first 6 months of COTZ distribution, to prime the value chain. | “Scratch card” vouchers redeemable by mobile phone were complicated to administer. Cessation of vouchers 6 months into distribution did not unduly undermine demand at the COTZ trial RRP.6 | Electronically managed discount vouchers were costly/unsustainable and ruled out of scale-up plans, although simple paper vouchers were deployed to kick-start the value chain in scale-up projects. |
| Cost of social marketing/marketing. | It was too ambitious to fully establish the brand within a 12-month trial, even in the trial areas. | Funded scale-up projects continued social marketing, with the manufacturer gradually taking on some commercial marketing by the end of scale-up and fully from 2018 onward, although their investment capacity in marketing is low. |
| Cost of retailer training/CHW training in product benefits/basic health issues. | Product benefits and basic health issues were well retained, both by trained retailers and CHWs. COTZ training materials (large-scale booklets for use at public meetings) were too costly for scale-up. | Scale-up training materials reduced to 10 illustrated flash cards39 (Figure 5); these were offered as open-source materials. Knowledge of the product’s benefits began to be embedded with health staff/CHWs by the end of scale-up and now form part of CHWs’ practice.40 |
Abbreviations: CHW, community health worker; COTZ, ColaLife Operational Trial in Zambia; MOH, Ministry of Health; ORS, oral rehydration salts; RRP, recommended retail price.