Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 1;6:0280. doi: 10.34133/research.0280

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Effect of transmission distance, turbulence, and noise on FOAM decoding. (A) Cross-sectional maps of pressure and phase at different transmission distances of 29.41λ, 58.82λ, 117.64λ, 235.29λ, 588.24λ, and 1,176.47λ in the same field of view for l = ±1.4. (B) Corresponding cross-sectional maps of pressure and phase in the nonideal transmission condition with a weak turbulence of Cn2=1014. As indicated by the dashed lines, the azimuthal angle of phase dislocation is independent of the transmission distance. (C) Distance dependence of the decoding accuracy with various turbulences (strong Cn2=1012, medium Cn2=1013, and weak Cn2=1014) for the 32-point dual-ring sampling. (D) Distance dependences of the optimized sampling radius for coupled FAVs with P-FOAMs of l = ±1 to ±4. (E) Decoding accuracy distribution with respect to the SNR of Gaussian noise. Scale bar, 2 cm.