Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 23;40:102665. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102665

Table 5.

Univariate analysis. Comparing second-line therapy and uterine-sparing interventions in women with severe PPH stratified by mode of birth between France and the Netherlands (2011–2013).




Vaginal birth


Cesarean birth


France

The Netherlands


France

The Netherlands

N = 214 N = 1002 N = 270 N = 342
Second-line uterotonics N (%) N (%) P-value N (%) N (%) P-value
Administered
Ergot alkaloids
Sulprostone
Misoprostol
187
0
178
9
(87.3)
(0.0)
(83.1)
(4.2)
826
99
679
408
(82,4)
(9,9)
(67,7)
(40,7)
0.03 192
0
190
2
(71.1)
(0,0)
(70.3)
(0.7)
236
28
221
83
(69.0)
(8.2)
(64.6)
(24.2)
0.35
Time PPH1 diagnosis - second-line uterotonics (median (IQR2)) (minutes) 25 (15–45) 46 (17–90) < 0.001 18 (8–45) 45 (12–113) <0.001
Uterine sparing interventions
Women with any uterine-sparing intervention 134 (62.6) 394 (39.3) < 0.001 155 (57.4) 133 (38.9) <0.001
Multiple uterine-sparing interventions 28 (13.1) 85 (8.4) 0.03 23 (8.5) 37 (10.8) 0.30
Intra uterine tamponade 86 (40.2) 347 (34.6) 0.12 28 (10.4) 86 (25.2) <0.001
Uterine compression sutures / vascular ligation 30 (14.1) 16 (1.6) < 0.001 107 (39.6) 27 (7.9) <0.001
Embolization 46 (21.5) 116 (11.6) < 0.001 43 (15.9) 57 (16.7) 0.89
1

postpartum hemorrhage; 2 inter quartile range.