Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 22;121(9):e2313925121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313925121

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3 act as if they have particular risk preferences. Both have the same mode as human distribution in the first round or when experiencing favorable outcomes in the Bomb Risk Game. When experiencing negative outcomes, ChatGPT-4 remains consistent and risk-neutral, while ChatGPT-3 acts as if it becomes more risk-averse.