Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 13;262(3):801–811. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06312-w

Table 2.

Comparison of optic disc morphology of the NMTM and MTM groups

Parameters NMTM group MTM group P1 P2
(n = 50) Total (n = 50) MTM Stage 1 (n = 25) MTM Stage 2 (n = 25)
Optic disc maximal diameter (mm) 1.78 ± 0.38 1.89 ± 0.49 1.93 ± 0.55 1.86 ± 0.44 0.213 0.625
Optic disc, minimal diameter (mm) 1.40 ± 0.43 1.21 ± 0.49 1.42 ± 0.52 1.18 ± 0.47 0.05 0.681
Optic disc tilt ratio 1.34 ± 0.31 1.69 ± 0.48 1.67 ± 0.51 1.71 ± 0.45 0.000 0.479
Optic disc rotation degree (°) 21.83 ± 14.96 20.31 ± 13.66 20.66 ± 15.72 19.96 ± 11.56 0.967 0.641
The area of optic disc (mm2) 2.20 ± 0.86 1.98 ± 1.01 1.95 ± 0.95 2.02 ± 1.08 0.156 0.892
DFD (mm) 5.83 ± 0.65 6.16 ± 0.74 6.12 ± 0.76 6.21 ± 0.73 0.019 0.706
PPA area (mm2) 3.20 ± 2.12 7.27 ± 4.79 6.21 ± 3.11 8.32 ± 5.91 0.000 0.121
PPA/ONH 1.49 ± 0.96 4.10 ± 2.75 3.67 ± 2.15 4.54 ± 3.24 0.000 0.271
PST (mm) 385.70 ± 52.16 305.30 ± 61.34 314.44 ± 49.17 296.16 ± 71.21 0.000 0.297

Statistically significant P-values are shown in bold

DFD optic disc-fovea distance, PPA peripapillary atrophy, PPA/ONH peripapillary atrophy/optic nerve head, PST peripapillary scleral thick, P1 the comparison of the NMTM and MTM groups, P2: the comparison of the MTM Stage 1 and MTM Stage 2

t-test

U test