Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 18;10(5):e26427. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26427

Table 11.

Comparison of BCSs of cases 1–4 for IEEE-30 bus system.

Optimization method Cost ($/h) Emission (t/h) Loss (MW) VD (p.u.)
Case1rowhead
NSMA-SFab 864.85 0.097533 2.856 0.49609
NSGA–II–SF [30]ab 856.95 0.101 3.0935 0.4654
TLBO [45] 783.1329 1.8065 5.8742 0.4343
SHADE-SF [23]ab 782.503 1.762 5.770 0.463
GWO [35]a 785.7831 1.7648 6.0324 0.5143
HHO [36]a 785.1378 1.3775 6.4716 0.4856
PSO [43]a 790.2252 1.7274 6.5713 0.4245
ACNSDE-SF [30]a, b 843 0.123 3.5492 0.4356
MOEA/D-SF [41] 829.515 0.2501
Case2rowhead
NSMA-SFab 792.63 1.8016 6.41 0.40204
MOMICA [42] 804.96 0.0952
MOEA/D [8]b 799.99 0.354
MOEA/D-SF [37] 802.406 0.1362
SP-DE [6]b 803.4241 0b36424 9.7807 0.09772
ICBO [9] 803.3978 9.7453 0.1014
BSA [33] 803.4294 0.3546 9.3751 0.1147
Case 3rowhead
NSMA-SFab 856.44 0.11004 2.7762 0.4378
NSGA–II–SF [30]ab 853.54 0.11812 2.8492 0.4401
ACNSDE-SF [30]ab 827.33 0.19659 4.1918 0.4365
GWO [35]a 832.2049 0a0982 2.1056 0.5914
HHO [36]a 811.4170 0a7337 6.8614 0.4006
PSO [43]a 898.7527 0a0966 2.3776 0.4751
TLBO [45]a 882.2742 0a1004 2.1891 0.4705
MOPSO [8] 891.48 0.2144 3.9557
MOEA/D [8]b 902.54 0.2b07 3.4594
NSGA-II [8] 903.79 0.2103 3.7917
MOEA/D-SF [41] 881.012 0.2164 4.1441
Case 4rowhead
NSMA-SFab 859.97 0.09805 2.8134 0.70973
NSGA–II–SF [30]ab 796.42 1.3481 6.1125 0.4044
ACNSDE-SF [30]ab 850.38 0.11084 3.4526 0.42903
GWO [35]a 906.5425 0a2085 5.1738 0.3766
HHO [36]a 824.4960 0a1981 2.5172 0.4572
MOEA/D-SF [41] 842.446 0.2406 0.1092
TLBO [45] 935.6737 0.2682 5.4925 0.3774
MOPSO [8] 846.93 0.2386 0.2188
PSO [43]a 843.1084 0a3977 5.4799 0.3988
NSGA-II [8] 825.86 0.1421 0.2648
MOEA/D [8]b 850.28 0.1b55 0.2332

Bold values represent the best results.

a

MOOPF witharenewable energy sources.

b

MOOPF consbders the valve point effect in the cost calculation.