Table 12.
Comparison of BCSs of cases 5 and 6 for IEEE-30 bus system.
| Optimization method | Cost ($/h) | Emission (t/h) | Loss (MW) | VD (p.u.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 5 | ||||
| NSMA-SFab | 801.12 | 0.81015 | 4.8642 | 0.45371 |
| MOEA/D [8],b | 831.81 | – | 5b9923 | 0.1355 |
| B-MMOFPA [28] | 843.18 | – | 5.7886 | 0.1745 |
| MOEA/D-SF [37] | 836.7711 | 0.25003 | 5.58223 | 0.1258 |
| MOPSO [8] | 827.82 | – | 6.5929 | 0.1588 |
| NSGA-II [8] | 843.14 | – | 6.4917 | 0.1931 |
| Case 6 | ||||
| NSMA-SFab | 860.27 | 0.10232 | 2.638 | 0.61484 |
| NSGA–II–SF [26],a | 845.32 | 0.4a792 | 4.2069 | 0.39792 |
| ACNSDE-SF [26],a | 837.46 | 0.1a045 | 3.6984 | 0.4179 |
| GWO [31],a | 798.1537 | 0a1958 | 2.7832 | 0.4542 |
| HHO [32],a | 816.7495 | 0a0964 | 2.5902 | 0.4718 |
| PSO [39],a | 874.7760 | 0a0976 | 3.1304 | 0.6722 |
| TLBO [41],a | 878.3400 | 0a0958 | 2.6208 | 0.4528 |
| MJAYA [36],a | 837.5116 | 0a2028 | 4.4866 | 0.1117 |
| SHADE-SF [20]ab | 810.346 | 0.891 | 5.276 | 0.469 |
| MOEA/D-SF [37] | 919.04 | 0.6221 | 5.5429 | 0.453 |
| SMODE-SF [40] | 927.049 | 0.4721 | 5.3148 | 0.4215 |
| MOMICA [38] | 830.188 | 0.2523 | 5.585 | 0.2978 |
*Bold values represent the best results.
a
MOOPF witharenewable energy sources.
b
MOOPF consbders the valve point effect in the cost calculation.