Table 4b.
Adult nutritional outcomes as a function of both CF program-level food insecurity screening and area-level food access
Logistic regression of underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) |
Logistic regression of overweight (BMI >25 kg/m2) |
Linear regression of BMI (kg/m2) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 Unadjusted |
Model 2 Adjusted1 |
Model 1 Unadjusted |
Model 2 Adjusted1 |
Model 1 Unadjusted |
Model 2 Adjusted 1 |
|||||||
OR | p | OR | p | O R |
p | OR | p | β | p | β | p | |
CF program-level screening | ||||||||||||
At every visit (vs Less frequently) | 1.19 | 0.063 | 1.04 | 0.825 | 0.81 | 0.100 | 0.87 | 0.242 | −0.45 | 0.075 | −0.28 | 0.217 |
In writing (vs Verbal) | 0.99 | 0.866 | 0.92 | 0.523 | 1.22 * | 0.028 | 1.36 ** | 0.002 | 0.26 | 0.178 | 0.43 * | 0.032 |
Formal documentation (vs No) | 1.15 | 0.128 | 1.08 | 0.449 | 1.07 | 0.405 | 1.17 | 0.154 | 0.06 | 0.707 | 0.22 | 0.267 |
Food desert (LILA) | 1.48 * | 0.025 | 1.22 | 0.265 | 1.02 | 0.778 | 1.15 | 0.124 | 0.03 | 0.898 | 0.34 | 0.089 |
Adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, health insurance, genotype, CFTR modulator use, CFRD, PERT, supplemental feeding, and dietitian consultation
LILA=Low income, low access
Boldface indicates statistical significance: * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001