Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;26:e49178. doi: 10.2196/49178

Table 2.

Summary of meta-analysis results.

Outcomes Number of studies (n=13), n (%) Participants, n Statistical methods Effect estimates (95% CI) Heterogeneity, I2 (%)a (P value)
Weight 4 (31) 425 SMDb (IVc, random, 95% CI) –0.15 (–0.34 to 0.04) 0 (.49)
BMI 6 (46) 2070 MDd (IV, random, 95% CI) –0.01 (–1.70 to 1.68) 92 (<.01)
Systolic blood pressure 10 (77) 2866 MD (IV, random, 95% CI) –2.74 (–4.93 to –0.56) 64 (<.01)
Diastolic blood pressure 7 (54) 1388 MD (IV, random, 95% CI) –1.29 (–2.85 to 0.28) 13 (.33)
Total cholesterol 6 (46) 1321 SMD (IV, random, 95% CI) –0.10 (–0.28 to 0.08) 47 (.09)
LDLe cholesterol 6 (46) 2170 SMD (IV, random, 95% CI) –0.11 (–0.19 to –0.03) 21 (.27)
HDLf cholesterol 5 (38) 1208 SMD (IV, random, 95% CI) –0.10 (–0.22 to 0.01) 0 (.82)
Triglycerides 3 (23) 1018 SMD (IV, random, 95% CI) –0.07 (–0.32 to 0.18) 66 (.05)
Feasibility 13 (100) 3013 RRg (M-Hh, random, 95% CI) 0.99 (0.95 to 1.02) 54 (<.01)

aValues for n not provided for I2 percentages.

bSMD: standardized mean difference.

cIV: inverse-variance model.

dMD: mean difference.

eLDL: low-density lipoprotein.

fHDL: high-density lipoprotein.

gRR: risk ratio.

hM-H: Mantel-Haenszel model.