Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 2;24:283. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12019-w

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of model in MPN patients with different clinical characteristic

Group n Se
(%)
Sp
(%)
+LR -LR PPV
(%)
NPV
(%)
YI Accuracy
(%)
All stage MPN vs. BPN 60 68.3 84.5 4.406 0.375 0.82 0.721 0.528 76.3
Early MPN vs. BPN 26 42.3 84.5 2.729 0.682 0.55 0.766 0.268 71.4
Advanced MPN vs. BPN 31 87.1 84.5 5.619 0.153 0.75 0.924 0.716 85.4
LM(-) MPN vs. BPN 20 35.0 84.5 2.258 0.769 0.44 0.790 0.195 71.8
LM(+) MPN vs. BPN 24 87.5 84.5 5.645 0.148 0.70 0.942 0.720 85.4
DM(-) MPN vs. BPN 27 44.4 84.5 2.865 0.658 0.57 0.766 0.289 71.7
DM(+) MPN vs. BPN 18 94.4 84.5 6.091 0.066 0.65 0.980 0.789 86.8
≥3cm MPN vs. BPN 43 94.1 84.5 6.071 0.070 0.82 0.942 0.786 88.1
<3cm MPN vs. BPN 17 58.1 84.5 3.748 0.496 0.52 0.875 0.426 78.7

MPN malignant pulmonary nodule, BPN benign pulmonary nodule, Se sensitivity, Sp specificity, AUC area under curve, 95%CI 95% confidence interval, +LR positive likelihood ratio, -LR negative likelihood ratio, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, YI Youden’s index, Advanced advanced LC, LM(-) Lymph node metastasis negative, LM(+) Lymph node metastasis positive, DM(-) distant metastasis negative, DM(+) distant metastasis positive, <3cm diameter<3cm, ≥3cm diameter≥3cm