Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 2;25:191. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07296-2

Table 3.

Comparison of Roles–Maudsley scores during treatment between the two groups (n = 80)

Control group
(n = 40)
Test group
(n = 40)
χ2 P
Pretreatment baseline difference 85% (n = 34) 80% (n = 32) 0.346 0.770
Fair 15% (n = 6) 20% (n = 8)
Good 0 (n = 0) 0 (n = 0)
Excellent 0 (n = 0) 0 (n = 0)
6 weeks after treatment difference 5% (n = 2) 0 (n = 0) 8.140 0.024
Fair 50% (n = 20) 30% (n = 12)
Good 45% (n = 18) 62.5% (n = 25)
Excellent 0 (n = 0) 7.5% (n = 3)
12 weeks after treatment difference 10% (n = 4) 0 (n = 0) 8.498 0.025
Fair 70% (n = 28) 60% (n = 24)
Good 20% (n = 8) 32.5% (n = 13)
Excellent 0 (n = 0) 7.5% (n = 3)